Is anything True or is it all Lies?
The witnesses needed to be served a
subpoena for two reasons;
1) T provide to their employer to
show cause for taking day off work
2) Most important reason is the fact
both of the witnesses had received verbal threats from an associate of Mary and
Mary was in fact attempting to locate
these people in order to provide their location to the man who threatened
They were warned to keep their mouths
shut, to stay out of it and if they do so they will be just fine.
Mary, her attorney and Detective
Stewart were made aware of one affidavit from a threatened witness during the
deposition of Stewart.
Prior to this Mary had made no
attempt to locate either witness, but upon realizing they would be in court she
knew she must locate them since they would not be keeping their mouths
Mary had been made aware of one such
threat against myself and it has been documented and she even provided such to
the police in 2001.
Because of statements made by Stewart
my attorney decided we should refile the case to include additional information;
then we learned of her attempt to locate the threatened witnesses.
My attorney said it was very alarming
and expressed his concerns for the safety of the witnesses should we refile the
I share the same concerns, therefore
I will not reveal the names of these witnesses, but assure everyone I have their
sworn affidavits in these matters.
The fact Mary tried to find them
shows the threats were not idle in nature.
The witnesses had been laying low off
the radar to keep Mary and the man who they named as issuing such threat from
Nothing was done to her for her
attempt to tamper with the witnesses.
See a pattern again?
Threats, intimidation, control is the
name of the game. These people play upon the fear of others, in fact they count
on such fear, for it benefits them.
Not, like I have not been afraid
during this, that night they attacked her I will never forget, and it will
always haunt me.
Yes, Burec sabotaged his computer to
get a new one under warranty, police did not believe me about that
That happened several months before
fire, the fire was planned due to extensive terrine damage, Mary and I were
aware of such damage since we had been to the home many times and it was pointed
out to us.
Mary claims that if the stories John
(myself) are telling are not true (re: arson, drug assault) then none of it is
I have told the police for years she
had to discredit myself in the matter of the arson and drug assault, in order to
prevent myself from being believed about the rest of it.
That was just one reason she
needed the restraining order.
The rest of it had to do with the
threats made against Mary by the Burec's after they knocked her out with the
Rohypnol and what the Burec's admitted to myself that night as far as what they
do to women and why and where they find some of these women to commit such acts
I think I can safely say the arson
and drug assault in fact happened, after all she lied for them on both counts
and the lies have been proven to be such; therefore since those events are true
the rest of what I have said is also true.
There are many things I'm aware
of and Mary does not know I'm aware of such.
I'm aware of what she told a work
associate of mine when I was in Nevada (the call was placed on my cell, volume
turned up high so I could hear what she told my friend).
I'm painfully aware that she stated I
must stop trying to help her because every time I do she is punished. Similar
comment was made to one of the threatened witnesses and is in
She does not know I'm aware that
after a certain event happened (I verified event with the authorities) the
Burec's punished her for my actions as she admitted during talk with work
That 7 minute talk with Mary stunned
and shocked my friend, who until that moment was doubting what I had told
Mary also confirmed to my friend
something else; Burec had made another threat, one that involves the
manufactured home that Mary and I own together.
My friend had initially called to
talk with her about the home (judge permitted such calls known as 'third party'
and is in court transcript).
Naturally the police called myself a
liar about that as well and refused to verify via the transcript.
Mary confirmed to my friend that she
must move our home to lake property owned by the Burec's and she had no choice
in the matter.
Burec had told myself many times he
would take the home from us, move it there and receive the home from us 'paid
I heard Mary say this, later she
confirmed same thing to 3 other people. Now you know why she could not have me
learn of lawsuit and why she lied in her affidavit to keep me from knowing of
Now you know why she lied to the
police to get a warrant and why the warrant was issued one day before docket
call in the matter.
Now you know why Mary tried to have
me arrested when I showed up at courthouse (to gain default judgment) to
attend the trial and protect my property
I informed the police and family
members that such would be the case, months before Mary confirmed
Not one thing has been done to stop
I stated in court on the record why
she took such action, Mary did not deny it either, yet the judge awarded the
home to her.
The judge might have just as well
given it to the Burec's himself.
I appealed his crazy decision and
won, the house they are still after since Mary still lives there.
Now you know why she was sent back to
the home the very night she knew I was returning home....to protect the home for
Should I have be allowed to return
home I would have possession not her and them?
Law enforcement has helped her every
step of the way and used the order as the excuse to do so and in doing so have
actually aided the Burec's with their criminal plot.
Kansas City, Mo. police were so
helpful they issued a pick up order for myself issued the very day Mary knew I
was returning, the very day she returned to my legal address.
THEY DID THAT AFTER THE PROSECUTOR
TOLD THEM THEY WOULD NOT ISSUE A WARRANT FOR MYSELF.
The police are not aware I have the
full police report including the pick up order.
Question is; pick me up for what
I will tell you why.
I was to return home (Mary was next
door as confirmed to myself by neighbor later) I would have been closer than 500
feet from her, would have been in violation of the order even though I would
have been at my legal residence which I own, everything was in place except for
I had learned of what she was up to
and did not return home because I could not do so safely.
I was so sure she would be returning
to the house that I hired another private investigator to watch the home and
notify me if Mary in fact returned, the investigator called me, identified Mary
I then called the neighbor to confirm what investigator told me.
Again the vigilante police (maybe
Gestapo is a better descriptive word) acted against myself and actively helped
Mary and by default helped the Burec's.
Then again maybe the help has not
been by default for the Burec's.
Her question on tape: concerning the
fire and what purpose it served, should be obvious to her, the purpose was
termite damage was extensive, and they wanted a new house.
Again I must state, the very fact she
lied for them concerning her whereabouts and what she did or did not hear Mr.
Burec say in this matter should be enough to cause concern in the
Did the Burec's handle
Mary says they did not.
Then again I have already shown
evidence that Mary does lie for the Burec's.
Later I will share information, that
should further cause the readers of this site to understand the Burec's did in
fact 'handle' her.
That information goes directly to the
rest of what I have said and I believe will cause most to understand fully why
my credibility had to be destroyed and why I was made the target of the police
with the restraining order.